Thinking Transtheoretically About Alliance and Rupture: Implications for Practice and Training

Authors

  • Sigal Zilcha-Mano Orcid
    Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
  • J. Christopher Muran Orcid
    Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Repairing alliance ruptures has the potential to serve as a powerful mechanism of change in psychotherapy. In this article, a transtheoretical individual-specific framework for repairing alliance ruptures is proposed. According to the proposed framework, at the intake session, the therapist evaluates the trait-like tendencies of individual patients to face ruptures in interpersonal relationships. We propose a typology based on which patients are assigned to one of the following therapeutic strategies: (a) a treatment where alliance rupture and repair is the main mechanism of change (Type A), (b) an added module that augments another treatment, focusing on rupture and repair (Type B), or (c) treatment where no rupture resolution work is carried out (Type C). The proposed framework is based on cumulative clinical knowledge, and its validity and utility need to be assessed in future research.